<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASP.NET Meta Keywords and Description</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnnycoder.com/blog/2010/01/05/aspnet-meta-keywords-and-description/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnnycoder.com/blog/2010/01/05/aspnet-meta-keywords-and-description/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Griswold</title>
		<link>http://johnnycoder.com/blog/2010/01/05/aspnet-meta-keywords-and-description/comment-page-1/#comment-217779</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Griswold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnycoder.com/blog/2010/01/05/aspnet-meta-keywords-and-description/#comment-217779</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the comment, Alex. You&#039;re right. Ever since Google stopped considering Meta Tags they don&#039;t provide a lot of value.  That said, you still use them, right? So it&#039;s nice that they are easier to management inside of the framework now. Your point about better improvements is well taken though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the comment, Alex. You&#8217;re right. Ever since Google stopped considering Meta Tags they don&#8217;t provide a lot of value.  That said, you still use them, right? So it&#8217;s nice that they are easier to management inside of the framework now. Your point about better improvements is well taken though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://johnnycoder.com/blog/2010/01/05/aspnet-meta-keywords-and-description/comment-page-1/#comment-217772</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnycoder.com/blog/2010/01/05/aspnet-meta-keywords-and-description/#comment-217772</guid>
		<description>Wish it had been implemented years ago when keyword meta tag counted more by search engines. At the moment it has little or virtually no effect on search engines. Besides it doesn&#039;t take much efforts to implement this and re-use it through out your projects... 

A better improvement could have been putting viewstate at the bottom right before  tag! But it seems that asp.net team cares little about recommendations on seo friendly site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish it had been implemented years ago when keyword meta tag counted more by search engines. At the moment it has little or virtually no effect on search engines. Besides it doesn&#8217;t take much efforts to implement this and re-use it through out your projects&#8230; </p>
<p>A better improvement could have been putting viewstate at the bottom right before  tag! But it seems that asp.net team cares little about recommendations on seo friendly site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

